首页> 外文OA文献 >Negotiated reorienting: A grounded theory of nurses' end-of-life decision-making in the intensive care unit
【2h】

Negotiated reorienting: A grounded theory of nurses' end-of-life decision-making in the intensive care unit

机译:协商重新定向:重症监护室护士终生决策的基础理论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Intensive care units (ICUs) focus on treatment for those who are critically ill and interventions to prolong life. Ethical issues arise when decisions have to be made regarding the withdrawal and withholding of life-sustaining treatment and the shift to comfort and palliative care. These issues are particularly challenging for nurses when there are varying degrees of uncertainty regarding prognosis. Little is known about nurses' end-of-life (EoL) decision-making practice across cultures. OBJECTIVES: To understand nurses' EoL decision-making practices in ICUs in different cultural contexts. DESIGN: We collected and analysed qualitative data using Grounded Theory. SETTINGS: Interviews were conducted with experienced ICU nurses in university or hospital premises in five countries: Brazil, England, Germany, Ireland and Palestine. PARTICIPANTS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 51 nurses (10 in Brazil, 9 in England, 10 in Germany, 10 in Ireland and 12 nurses in Palestine). They were purposefully and theoretically selected to include nurses having a variety of characteristics and experiences concerning end-of-life (EoL) decision-making. METHODS: The study used grounded theory to inform data collection and analysis. Interviews were facilitated by using key questions. The comparative analysis of the data within and across data generated by the different research teams enabled researchers to develop a deeper understanding of EoL decision-making practices in the ICU. Ethical approval was granted in each of the participating countries and voluntary informed consent obtained from each participant. RESULTS: The core category that emerged was 'negotiated reorienting'. Whilst nurses do not make the 'ultimate' EoL decisions, they engage in two core practices: consensus seeking (involving coaxing, information cuing and voice enabling); and emotional holding (creating time-space and comfort giving). CONCLUSIONS: There was consensus regarding the core concept and core practices employed by nurses in the ICUs in the five countries. However, there were some discernible differences regarding the power dynamics in nurse-doctor relationships, particularly in relation to the cultural perspectives on death and dying and in the development of palliative care. The research suggests the need for culturally sensitive ethics education and bereavement support in different cultural contexts.
机译:背景:重症监护病房(ICU)专注于重症患者的治疗和延长寿命的干预措施。当必须决定是否退出和停止维持生命的治疗以及转向舒适和姑息治疗时,就会产生伦理问题。当预后存在不同程度的不确定性时,这些问题对护士尤其具有挑战性。对于跨文化的护士的临终(EoL)决策实践知之甚少。目的:了解不同文化背景下ICU中护士的EoL决策做法。设计:我们使用扎根理论收集并分析了定性数据。地点:在五个国家(巴西,英格兰,德国,爱尔兰和巴勒斯坦)的大学或医院里,经验丰富的ICU护士进行了访谈。参与者:对51名护士进行了半结构化访谈(巴西10名,英格兰9名,德国10名,爱尔兰10名,巴勒斯坦12名护士)。他们经过有目的地和理论上的选择,以包括具有各种有关寿命终止(EoL)决策的特征和经验的护士。方法:本研究采用扎根理论为数据收集和分析提供依据。通过使用关键问题来促进访谈。通过对不同研究团队生成的数据之间以及内部数据的比较分析,研究人员可以加深对ICU中EoL决策实践的了解。每个参与国均获得了道德批准,并获得了每个参与方的自愿知情同意。结果:出现的核心类别是“谈判重新定向”。尽管护士没有做出“最终”的EoL决定,但他们采用了两种核心实践:寻求共识(涉及同轴,信息提示和语音使能);和情感上的支持(创造时空和给予安慰)。结论:在五个国家的重症监护病房中,护士采用的核心概念和核心实践已达成共识。但是,在护士与医生的关系中,尤其是在文化上关于死亡和死亡的观点以及姑息治疗的发展方面,存在着一些明显的差异。研究表明,需要在不同的文化背景下进行文化敏感的道德教育和丧亲支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号